Already a member?
Sign in
Physics and data analysis
Today physics education consists of teaching Newtonian doctrine mixed with data analysis techniques.
This is a strange mixture.
As the result of their education physicists truly believe that when they do data analysis they are doing Newtonian physics!!
To me data analysis and Newtonian doctrine are two different subjects with no relation.
I am trying to understand the relationship between data analysis and physics. I asked this question before but I did not get a clear answer.
Can any one who never studied physics do data analysis?
For instance do I need to know any physics at all to analyze the Cosmic Microwave Radiation?
This is a strange mixture.
As the result of their education physicists truly believe that when they do data analysis they are doing Newtonian physics!!
To me data analysis and Newtonian doctrine are two different subjects with no relation.
I am trying to understand the relationship between data analysis and physics. I asked this question before but I did not get a clear answer.
Can any one who never studied physics do data analysis?
For instance do I need to know any physics at all to analyze the Cosmic Microwave Radiation?
Latest page update: made by pioneer1
, Jan 14 2007, 10:45 PM EST
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by pioneer1
2 words added
2 words deleted
view changes
- complete history)
Edited by pioneer1
2 words added
2 words deleted
view changes
- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pioneer1 | Jurisdiction of physics | 0 | May 2 2007, 11:16 PM EDT by pioneer1 | |
|
Thread started: May 2 2007, 11:16 PM EDT
Watch
This is also related to jurisdiction of physics, why are simple algorithms considered physics? Because they are associated with scholastic labels physicists create.
I also noticed that there are several other kinds of dualities in physics, one of which is experiment/theory. Most often what is measured has nothing to do with what is modelled. There is no connection with the gadget and the theory. Physicist counts the oscillations of an oscillator and then associate it with a theoretical speculation. We know this already. |
||||