Location: Physics and data analysis

Discussion: Jurisdiction of physicsReported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 post

pioneer1
Jurisdiction of physics
May 2 2007, 11:16 PM EDT | Post edited: May 2 2007, 11:16 PM EDT
This is also related to jurisdiction of physics, why are simple algorithms considered physics? Because they are associated with scholastic labels physicists create.

I also noticed that there are several other kinds of dualities in physics, one of which is experiment/theory. Most often what is measured has nothing to do with what is modelled. There is no connection with the gadget and the theory. Physicist counts the oscillations of an oscillator and then associate it with a theoretical speculation. We know this already.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None

Sign in to be the first to reply.